Review Form

Reviewer:

Date:

Manuscript Title:

I. Substantive and Technical Evaluation of the Paper

1. Does the paper have a clear and well-defined research question or claim?

a) yes

b) no

2. Is the claim novel and previously unexplored in discourse?

a) yes

b) no

3. Does the paper present a novel approach to the research question? Even if the research question itself is not original, does the author offer a fresh perspective to the established discourse?

a) yes

b) no

4. Are the arguments presented in a logically sound and well-reasoned manner?

a) yes

b) average

c) no

5. Does the paper engage in critical analysis?

a) yes

b) average

c) no

6. Does the paper examine the legal problem in thorough and comprehensive manner?

a) yes

b) average

c) no

7. Does the paper offer practicable recommendations? Are the recommendations in accordance with legal practice and theory?

a) yes

b) no

8. Does the paper have the potential to influence future legal scholarship or developments?

a) yes

b) no

9. Is the methodology used to arrive at the findings sound and appropriate for the research question?

a) yes

b) average

c) no

10. Is the paper well-written and well-structured?

a) yes

b) average

c) no

II. Overall Recommendation

11. Suggest your recommendation:

a) the paper can be accepted for publication as is.

b) the paper can be accepted for publication with revisions.

c) the paper can be rejected.

III. Additional Comments

12. Please provide any additional comments or suggestions for the author(s) and/or Editor-in-Chief:

Bu post həm də digər dildə mövcuddur: Azərbaycanca